On January 13, 2010, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Director of Enforcement Robert Khuzami announced new tools that the SEC will be using to secure cooperation from individuals and companies in order to enhance its investigative and case efforts. The SEC has authorized its staff to use cooperation, deferred prosecution, and non-prosecution agreements, which have long been in use by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The SEC has also set forth the way in which it will evaluate a witness’s cooperation, with substantial assistance—another key DOJ concept—being central. Additionally, the SEC streamlined the process for obtaining immunity for witnesses.
Khuzami is continuing his implementation of initiatives announced early in his tenure at a speech given to the City Bar in New York. This cooperation initiative highlights that he is remaking the Enforcement Division in the image of a prosecutor’s office. Khuzami expects that this step will further facilitate swift and comprehensive steps against securities fraud as it unfolds, thus better protecting investors. One aspect is that the SEC will be able to more easily pursue a company and its high-level officers by entering into these agreements with lower level employees.
In order to facilitate developing cooperating witnesses and tapping inside information on securities fraud schemes, the Enforcement Division is going to begin using agreements like those that their counterparts at DOJ use:
See Section 6 of the SEC Division of Enforcement Manual. (It is worth noting that the Policy Statement in the revised Manual, on its face, applies to individuals. However, the press release and the tenor of Khuzami’s remarks suggest that this initiative was to encourage cooperation by both individuals and companies.)
It has been the DOJ standard that cooperation must be truthful and complete, and arise to substantial assistance, a concept that resides in Section 5K1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Substantial assistance typically means that the information is of a nature that others can be charged for their misconduct based on it. Whether the cooperator avoids charges altogether, albeit with other conditions, e.g. fines, restitution and a compliance program or monitoring (a non-prosecution agreement); avoids charges being pursued after a specified period of time, but with conditions like those referred to with respect to a non-prosecution agreement (a deferred prosecution agreement); or must admit to a charge, but is eligible for some lesser penalty based on his cooperation, has been determined by DOJ based on a variety of factors.
The SEC has identified four guidelines that it will use to evaluate cooperation:
See Section 6 of the SEC Division of Enforcement Manual. These open-ended guidelines encompass the types of considerations that DOJ takes into account. DOJ’s considerations typically include the nature and circumstances of the offense, the nature and value of the cooperation, the cooperator’s criminal history, the timeliness of the cooperation, and whether the cooperation will contribute to the prompt and complete charging and disposition of others. See United States Attorney’s Manual 9-27.420. The SEC has given itself room to consider these and other factors.
Finally, the SEC has simplified the process for submitting witness immunity requests to the DOJ. This appears to involve expediting obtaining the appropriate approvals within the Commission. See Section 6 of the SEC Division of Enforcement Manual.
In his January 13 remarks, Khuzami also announced chiefs of the five new specialized investigative units he announced in his August 5 speech:
The SEC also announced that Thomas Sporkin, Deputy Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement since 2001, has been named head of the Office of Market Intelligence.
On August 5, Khuzami also announced other new initiatives. One is to streamline review (and redeploy branch managers to manage cases). The Director of Enforcement can issue Formal Orders. No advance Commission approval is needed to issue a subpoena; a local senior officer can do so. If defense counsel is dilatory with voluntary production, they will receive a subpoena immediately. Senior officers will have authority with respect to routine settlements and the opening of routine investigations. However, tolling agreements will require approval of the Enforcement Director.
The SEC is also going to increase the number of trial attorneys and has brought on a new COO, Adam Storch, formerly of Goldman Sachs’ Business Intelligence unit.
At least as interesting as any of the recent steps by the SEC Enforcement Division is the overall impression that Khuzami is making the division more like a prosecutor’s office—stripping away bureaucracy, focusing on subject matter areas designed to have maximum impact, providing tools to develop witnesses quickly, and beefing up the trial unit. Of particular note is the cooperation guidelines for individuals. This forecasts that the SEC—on its own and without the need of DOJ or its tools—plans to brings more high-profile cases, and to do so more quickly, with the cooperation of corporate employees.
For assistance in this area, please contact one of the attorneys listed below or any member of your Mintz Levin client service team.
R. Robert Popeo
Chairman
(617) 348-1716
RRPopeo@mintz.com
Robert I. Bodian
Managing Member
(212) 692-6726
RBodian@mintz.com
Tracy A. Miner
Chair,
White Collar Defense Practice
(617) 348-1694
TMiner@mintz.com
Peter A. Chavkin
(212) 692-6231
PChavkin@mintz.com
Peter M. Saparoff
Co-Chair,
Securities Litigation Practice
(617) 348-1725
PMSaparoff@mintz.com
John F. Sylvia
Co-Chair,
Securities Litigation Practice
(617) 348-1820
JSylvia@mintz.com
Kevin N. Ainsworth
(212) 692-6745
KAinsworth@mintz.com
Peter A. Biagetti
(617) 348-4472
PABiagetti@mintz.com
Michael F. Connolly
(617) 348-4448
MFConnolly@mintz.com
Thomas S. Crane
(617) 348-1676
TSCrane@mintz.com
Robert Delahunt, Jr.
(617) 348-4480
RMDelahunt@mintz.com
Francis J. Earley
(212) 692-6230
FEarley@mintz.com
Hope S. Foster
(202) 661-8758
HSFoster@mintz.com
Michael S. Gardener
(617) 348-1642
MSGardener@mintz.com
Seth R. Goldman
(212) 692-6845
SRGoldman@mintz.com
Jerome Gotkin
(212) 692-6712
JGotkin@mintz.com
John K. Markey
(617) 348-1686
JMarkey@mintz.com
Joseph P. Messina
(617) 348-1631
JMessina@mintz.com
Allison W. “Chip” Phinney, III Ph.D.
(617) 348-3061
AWPhinney@mintz.com
Jeffrey S. Robbins
(617) 348-1722
jsrobbins@mintz.com
Bridget M. Rohde
(212) 692-6883
BMRohde@mintz.com
Patrick J. Sharkey
(617) 348-1734
PJSharkey@mintz.com
Adam L. Sisitsky
(617) 348-1689
ALSisitsky@mintz.com
Peter B. Zlotnick
(212) 692-6887
pbzlotnick@mintz.com
Francis X. Bellotti
(617) 348-1606
FXBellotti@mintz.com
Steve Ganis
(617) 348-1672
SGanis@mintz.com
Kristen S. Scammon
(617) 348-4429
KSScammon@mintz.com
Eoin P. Beirne
(617) 348-1707
EPBeirne@mintz.com
Benjamin S. Clark
(617) 348-1852
BSClark@mintz.com
Brian P. Dunphy
(617) 348-1810
BDunphy@mintz.com
Garrett G. Gillespie
(617) 348-4499
GGGillespie@mintz.com
Helen Gerostathos Guyton
(202) 434-7385
hgguyton@mintz.com
Meredith M. Leary
(617) 348-4780
MMLeary@mintz.com
Breton Leone-Quick
(617) 348-4832
BLeone-Quick@mintz.com
Matthew D. Levitt
(617) 348-1646
MDLevitt@mintz.com
Jessica C. Sergi
(617) 348-1766
JCSergi@mintz.com
Marbree D. Sullivan
(617) 348-3066
MSullivan@mintz.com
Benjamin B. Tymann
(617) 210-6853
BBTymann@mintz.com
McKenzie E. Webster
(617) 210-6856
MWebster@mintz.com