Skip to main content

Employment

Viewpoints

Filter by:

My colleagues in the firm’s Immigration Practice recently posted an advisory on F-1 students with OPT employment eligibility, and what those students should keep in mind before October 1. If this applies to you and you find yourself in one of the below situations, read the advisory to get more info.
Read more
Beach towel - check, sunscreen - check, beach tunes playlist - check, make sure the company complies with California’s July 2014 minimum wage increase - che...wait, what?! You ask, “how is it possible that a California employment law is now part of my summer plans?!”
Read more
A recent submission in an advice column on Boston.com struck my eye and the scenario should be no surprise to the modern worker. A Massachusetts at-will worker decides to take a “mental health day” and calls in sick, despite the fact that he is not actually sick.
Read more
Yet another federal court judge, the Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr. of the Eastern District of Missouri, recently ruled, in Whittaker v. America's Car-Mart, Inc., that an employee’s severe obesity could constitute a “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Read more
Protecting your trade secrets and restricting competition is important, and getting the right restrictive covenant is part of that protection. Join Bret Cohen, Mitch Danzig, and Jeff Lambert, the Chief Legal Officer of our client The Active Network, for this webinar on May 28th.
Read more
Commencing with plan and policy years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, the Affordable Care Act amends the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”) to make three important changes to the rules governing health insurance underwriting practices that apply to the individual and group markets (but not to grandfathered arrangements):
Read more
A recent decision from a Massachusetts superior court reinforces what we’ve known for quite some time – be extremely mindful of the actions you take with respect to an employee lodging a complaint under M.G.L. 151B, the state’s anti-discrimination statute, or else you may face retaliation claim and hefty monetary damages.
Read more
Templates are available here in English and other available languages.  Make sure to also provide this notice to any new hire on a going forward basis.
Read more
Many employers are surprised to learn that the employment relationship does not automatically convert to “at-will” when an employee’s fixed employment term expires. Instead, when asking for clarification on this issue, employers are usually on the receiving end of their least favorite lawyerly answer: “It depends.”
Read more
With so much attention focused on the particulars of the employer shared responsibility and, to a slightly lesser extent, reporting rules, it’s easy to lose sight of other important changes—including final regulations issued under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA)
Read more
Two recent victories for the EEOC should remind employers that rejecting a job applicant over a medical condition, even when the condition appears directly related to job performance, can expose the employer to serious legal consequences under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).
Read more
Judge Selya’s recent First Circuit opinion in Rivera-Diaz v. Humana Insurance of Puerto Rico, Inc., hammers home the importance of strictly abiding by Title VII’s procedural requirements for filing discrimination claims in federal court under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Read more
Mintz's Privacy Team maintains a summary of the US state data breach notification laws, which it refers to as the “Mintz Matrix," and updates on a quarterly basis or more frequently if developments dictate.  This week, the Privacy Team updated the Matrix once again, this time to reflect recent changes to Kentucky and Iowa’s laws.
Read more
I was quoted in an article published today on Law360 about the ADA's interactive process requirement.
Read more
Last week, President Obama issued two important directives aimed at ending gender pay disparities. The first, an Executive Order, prohibits federal contractors and subcontractors with government contracts exceeding $10,000 from retaliating against employees who discuss their compensation with their co-workers.
Read more
Particularly with the issuance of final regulations under the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility rules, employers have been concerned—justifiably—with the pay-or-play penalties.
Read more
Our colleague, Sarah Hogan, recently posted a fantastic entry on Mintz's brand new Technology Matters blog about Massachusetts' proposed non-compete legislation, with practical guidance for what its passage might mean for your business.
Read more
For “applicable large employers” (i.e., generally, those employers who employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees on business days during the preceding calendar year), determining which employees are “full-time” employees is central to their efforts to comply with the employer shared responsibility provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
Read more
We have written a few times about the EEOC’s closer inspection of background checks and the use of criminal records in employment decisions because of their potential adverse impact on classes of applicants.
Read more
Recently, New York Mets player Daniel Murphy was criticized for taking a few days off at the start of the season to bond with his newborn.  In this Law360 Article, I comment on this issue and weigh in on what employers should be doing to comply with the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Read more
Sign up to receive email updates from Mintz.
Subscribe Now

Explore Other Viewpoints: