New recipients: subscribe here.  

Green Building Newsletter

February 2014

To our clients and friends:

We are pleased to present you with our February issue of Mintz Levin’s Green Building Newsletter.


AB 1103 Update: Nonresidential Building Energy Use Disclosure Requirements Now In Effect

By Brandon Barker

After a series of delays in both implementation and enforcement, as of January 1, 2014, California Assembly Bill 1103 (“AB 1103,” codified as California Public Resources Code Section 25402.10) is now in effect and enforceable by the California Energy Commission (“CEC”) for all nonresidential buildings1 exceeding a total gross floor area of 10,000 square feet.2 Nonresidential buildings with a total gross floor area measuring at least 5,000 square feet and up to 10,000 square feet will be required to comply with the statute as of July 1, 2014.3

Under AB 1103, owners and operators of nonresidential buildings must disclose certain building energy performance data to a prospective buyer, a tenant of the entire building, or a lender who would finance or refinance the entire building before the sale, lease, financing, or refinancing of the building occurs.

For a more extensive discussion of the background of AB 1103, and the nature, scope, and timing of the required disclosures, please access the March 2013 issue of Mintz Levin’s Green Building Newsletter here.

Mixed Use Buildings

The CEC recently clarified the applicability of AB 1103 to mixed use buildings.4 If a portion of a mixed use building is residential (e.g., condominium), the owner or operator of the building is not required to disclose the energy performance data; however, as set forth in Endnote 1 below, the regulations provide that AB 1103 applies to R-1 buildings (e.g., a hotel) and I-1 buildings (e.g., an assisted living facility). Consequently, buildings that contain a mixture of nonresidential and R-1 use or nonresidential and I-1 use (among other possible combinations) are required to comply with the statute.

Access to Tenant Utility Usage Data

Frequently in leases, tenants will pay utilities directly to utility companies, and a landlord may not have access to such utility bills. As a result, where a landlord wants to sell, lease, finance, or refinance the entire building (and the building is subject to the statute), a landlord may have difficulty obtaining the relevant energy usage data from the tenant.

The regulations do permit an owner or operator to reasonably approximate data if an owner or operator has made a reasonable effort to ascertain missing information. Additionally, in cases where only partial data is available, the CEC has stated that owners or operators may, for example, use the data from one tenant for another, or use the partial data of one tenant to determine the energy usage of the entire building. Building energy models may also be used to estimate missing energy usage data. Further, where no data is available (and other measures to approximate the data are not suitable for the particular building), the Energy Star Portfolio Manager website does provide default values for different building types that may be applied by an owner or operator to the relevant building.

Nonetheless, to avoid relying on estimations that could trigger compliance questions from the CEC, a more prudent approach is to include language in leases and lease amendments, which obligates a tenant to provide energy usage data upon a landlord’s request. Here is an example (specific language would need to be tailored to the particular property and lease):

“If Tenant is billed directly by a utility company with respect to Tenant’s electricity [and natural gas/propane] usage at the Premises, then, promptly upon request, Tenant shall provide monthly electricity [and natural gas/propane] usage data for the Premises to Landlord for the period of time requested by Landlord (in electronic or paper format) or, at Landlord’s option, provide any written authorization or other documentation required for Landlord to request information regarding Tenant’s electricity [and natural gas/propane] usage data with respect to the Premises directly from the utility company.”

Enforcement of Statute and Regulations

Although neither the statute nor the regulations expressly impose fines or other penalties for noncompliance, the CEC recently indicated that it may investigate allegations of noncompliance, initiate civil and administrative proceedings to enforce compliance or obtain injunctive relief, and impose penalties and fines for noncompliance. Further, parties may file complaints with the CEC alleging noncompliance and request that the CEC undertake an investigation. It remains to be seen whether the CEC will be aggressive in enforcing the disclosure requirements.



1 Most nonresidential buildings are required to comply with the statute and its accompanying regulations. Specifically, the following building occupancy types, as defined in the California Building Code, are subject to the statute: Assembly (A), Business (B), Educational (E), Institutional – Assisted Living (I-1, R-1), Institutional – Nonambulatory (I-2), Mercantile (M), Residential – Transient (R-1), Storage (S), and Utility – Parking Garage (U). Conversely, all other building occupancy types are not subject to the statute, including, without limitation, the following: Factory and Industrial (F-1, F-2), High Hazard (H-1, H-2, H-3, H-4, H-5), Institutional (I-3, I-4), Residential (R-2, R-2.1, R-3, R-3.1, R-4), and Laboratory (L). Building occupancy types are set forth on building occupancy permits.

2 The updated final regulations promulgated by the CEC are available here.

3 Since a building owner or operator must open an account or update an existing account on the EPA’s Energy Star Portfolio Manager website at least 30 days before a required disclosure, a building owner or operator would need to initiate the compliance process on or before June 1, 2014 for a sale, lease, financing, or refinancing of an entire building that occurs on July 1, 2014.

4 An updated FAQ promulgated by the CEC is available here.



Ani E. Ajemian
[email protected]

David M. Alin
[email protected]

Frederick S. Armstrong
[email protected]

Brandon E. Barker
[email protected]

Brady Berg
[email protected]

Scott Biel
[email protected]

Joel R. Bloom
[email protected]

Thomas R. Burton, III
[email protected]

Allan Caggiano
[email protected]

Susan E. Carlson
[email protected]

Ralph A. Child
[email protected]

Paul Churchill
[email protected]

Adam B. Coffin
[email protected]

Andrew A. Dean
[email protected]

Christa S. Eilers
[email protected]

Meryl J. Epstein
[email protected]

Raymond C. Estes
[email protected]

Eric J. Freeman
[email protected]

Stephen E. Friedberg
[email protected]

Kenneth M. Gantz
[email protected]

Daniel O. Gaquin
[email protected]

Jason W. Georgitis
[email protected]

David A. Gilbert
[email protected]com

Jeremy D. Glaser
[email protected]

William M. Hill
[email protected]

Jennifer M. Kiely
[email protected]

Peter D. McCarthy
[email protected]

Jeffrey A. Moerdler
[email protected]

Mary Lee Moore
[email protected]

Marilyn Newman
[email protected]

David L. O'Connor
[email protected]

Susan P. Phillips
[email protected]

Jennifer Sacco Smith
[email protected]

Dawn Saunders
[email protected]

Gabriel Schnitzler
[email protected]

Samuel M. Starr
[email protected]

Bryan M. Stockton
[email protected]

Jennifer Sulla
[email protected]

Sahir Surmeli
[email protected]

Colin G. Van Dyke
[email protected]


» View the latest Energy & Clean Technology publications.

Share: by email on LinkedIn on Facebook on Twitter

» View other archives, articles, and past legal updates.


BostonLondonLos AngelesNew YorkSan DiegoSan FranciscoStamfordWashington

Follow Us LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube
FEEDBACK: Was this mailing helpful?


Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.