News & Press Releases
Filter by:
IRS Extends Period for Dial-In Bond Hearings
November 9, 2020
In an article published by Tax Notes, Mintz Member Christie Martin was quoted on behalf of the National Association of Bond Lawyers in response to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)’s recent extension until September 2021 of the period during which public approval hearings on qualified private activity bonds may take place by telephone.
What You Need To Know About Biden And IP
November 9, 2020
Mintz Member James Wodarski was quoted in an article published by Law360 on President-elect Joe Biden and his views on intellectual property.
‘Too Old’ to Be CEO — Bias Charges in Succession Plan
November 6, 2020
In Agenda, a Financial Times publication, Mintz Special Counsel Anne Bruno was quoted on company succession planning and how boards can effectively communicate the process and decision to candidates.
Mintz Member and head of the firm’s Royalty Monetization Practice Richard Gervase authored an article published by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) on royalty monetization transactions and how they can generate cash for life sciences innovators.
User Fees Will Be A Focus For Senate HELP, No Matter Who’s In Charge
November 5, 2020
An article published by Inside Health Policy featured extensive commentary from Senior Director of ML Strategies Aaron Josephson on priorities for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee following the 2020 Presidential election. Mintz Member Joanne Hawana was also quoted in the article.
A Critique of Glory Days and How Reports of Anticompetitive Risks of Pools Have Been Greatly Exaggerated
November 4, 2020
Mintz Member and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Division Michael Renaud, Members James Wodarski and Daniel Weinger, and Associate Kara Grogan co-authored an article published by IPWatchdog that critiques an article recently published in the University of San Diego Law titled “Glory Days: Do the Anticompetitive Risks of Standards-Essential Patent Pools Outweigh Their Procompetitive Benefits?,” which criticized patent pools, alleging inefficiencies and anticompetitive risks of pools for standard essential patents.
