Skip to main content

Bye, Bye Baby Shelf: SEC Takes Aim at Offering and Reporting Reform with Two New Proposed Rules

On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed two rulemakings described by Chairman Paul S. Atkins as “the foundation for my agenda to Make IPOs Great Again.” The two proposals — the Registered Offering Reform Proposal (Release Nos. 33-11418 and 34-105513) and the Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies Proposal (Release Nos. 33-11419 and 34-105515) — together represent the most significant overhaul of the public company registration and reporting framework in over two decades. 

Registered Offering Reform Proposal

Most notably, this proposal would eliminate the requirement that issuers be subject to Exchange Act reporting for at least 12 months before using Form S-3 and all form transaction requirements, including the instruction to Form S-3, known as the “baby shelf rule,” that currently requires issuers to have at least $75 million in public float in order to register an unlimited amount of securities in primary offerings using Form S-3. Despite its diminutive name, the baby shelf rule has been one of the biggest barriers to capital raising for small-cap issuers since its adoption in 2007. The SEC estimates 2,150 additional issuers would gain full Form S-3 access pursuant to this proposed amendment. The proposal would also extend Well-Known Seasoned Issuer (WKSI) accommodations and communication benefits — currently reserved for issuers with $700 million+ in public float — to exchange-listed companies eligible for Form S-3, with automatic shelf registration available to those issuers who have also been subject to Exchange Act reporting requirements for the previous 12 months. In addition, the proposal would preempt state blue sky registration and qualification requirements for SEC registered offerings and expand incorporation by reference eligibility for issuers offering pursuant to Form S-1.

Filer Status Overhaul and Expansion of Scaled Disclosure Accommodations Proposal

The second proposal would collapse the current alphabet soup of filer categories — large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company — into just two categories: large accelerated filers (LAFs) and non-accelerated filers (NAFs). The LAF public float threshold would increase from $700 million to $2 billion, measured over two consecutive years, with a 60-month post-IPO seasoning period. Issuers not qualifying as LAFs would be NAFs eligible for scaled disclosure and reporting accommodations currently enjoyed by certain smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies — including, perhaps most significantly, exemptions from the Section 404(b) requirements for auditor attestations of internal control over financial reporting. A new “small non-accelerated filer” subcategory (issuers with assets of less than $35 million) would also be eligible for extended 10-K and 10-Q filing deadlines. 

Key Takeaways

If adopted, these proposals would dramatically lower the barriers to capital formation for smaller and newer public companies while potentially reducing ongoing compliance costs for the vast majority of smaller issuers. Chairman Atkins signaled these are “just the beginning,” with a planned overhaul of Regulation S-K disclosure requirements “with materiality as its north star” still to come. We look forward to hearing more.

The full text of the proposals is available here: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-46-sec-proposes-transformative-reforms-help-public-companies-conduct-registered-offerings-simplify 

Comments on the proposals are due within 60 days. 

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Authors

Melanie Ruthrauff Levy is a Mintz attorney who counsels venture and private equity funds and public and private companies in corporate governance, public company reporting, and transactional matters. She represents issuers and financing sources in the life sciences, health care, and tech fields.
Anne L. Bruno is a Member at Mintz who advises clients ranging from start-ups to multinational public companies on issues related to corporate and employment law, including executive compensation, employee benefits, securities law, and corporate governance. She is also a key member of the firm’s multidisciplinary ESG practice, helping corporate boards, companies, and their investors navigate a broad range of environmental, social, and governance considerations.
Dan is a corporate and securities attorney whose practice spans the full gamut of corporate law. He has advised clients for over two decades in public and private equity and debt financings, securities law matters, mergers and acquisitions, and strategic advice on a broad range of other corporate matters. He capably counsels public and private companies with offerings, compliance, and securities questions and leads buyers and sellers throughout the transaction process. Dan represents life sciences companies as well as clients in other technology fields, financial services, and professional services firms.
Daniel A. Bagliebter

Daniel A. Bagliebter

Member / Co-chair, Securities & Capital Markets Practice

Daniel A. Bagliebter practices corporate and securities law at Mintz. He focuses his practice on securities offerings and mergers and acquisitions. Dan has represented both issuers and investment banking firms in capital market transactions, including public offerings.
Gretchen G. Goyette is an Associate at Mintz who focuses her practice on corporate transactions, securities, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate matters. She works with public and private companies of all sizes, including emerging companies.