Monthly TCPA Digest — June 2020

By Joshua Briones, Russell H. Fox, Matthew Novian

We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). This month we cover the Ninth Circuit’s recent N.L. v. Credit One Bank ruling that a bank’s placement of 189 automated calls to an unintended recipient, though resulting from a mix-up, violated the TCPA. The decision serves as a reminder that prior express consent must come from the party to whom the phone number is assigned.

In our Regulatory Update, we report on the FCC’s continuing, small steps to implement portions of the TRACED Act and extend protections against illegal and unwanted robocalls.

If you have suggestions for topics you’d like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz’s TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

 

In This Edition

Part I – TCPA Litigation Update

Part II – TCPA Regulatory Update

 

 

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Published

Viewpoint Topics

Professionals

Related Practices

Technology, Communications & Media Thumbnail

Monthly TCPA Digest — May 2020

May 14, 2020| Article|

Authors

Joshua Briones

Member / Managing Member, Los Angeles Office

Joshua Briones is a commercial litigator who defends consumer class actions for Mintz. He's represented clients in a wide range of industries, including financial services, life sciences, manufacturing, and retail, in cases involving false advertising, unfair trade practices, and other claims.

Russell H. Fox

Member

Russell H. Fox is a wireless communications attorney at Mintz. He guides clients through federal legislative, regulatory, and transactional matters. Russell also participates in FCC proceedings, negotiates spectrum agreements, and represents clients in spectrum auctions.

Matthew Novian