Skip to main content

FinCen Issues Statement Regarding Publication of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)

On September 1, 2020, the Financial Crimes Network (“FinCEN”) issued a statement regarding various media outlets’ intent to publish Suspicious Activity Reports (“SARs”) and “other sensitive government documents”.   The full statement may be found here. The release offers no changes regarding  the unauthorized disclosure of SARs,  and serves to remind everyone, including media outlets,  that publishing unlawfully disclosed information is a crime.  FinCEN has referred the matter to both the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Inspector General for further enforcement.

Generally, under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), U.S. financial institutions are required to file a SAR with FinCEN within 30 days if suspicious activity is detected in an account related to things like money laundering, fraud or terrorist financing. However, the BSA and other federal regulations specifically prohibit the unauthorized disclosure of the SAR, or any information that may reveal the existence of the SAR. This confidentiality requirement is taken seriously by the Government, and disclosure of the contents in (or mere existence of) a SAR is viewed by law enforcement to be a serious matter. Accordingly, the penalties can be severe.  Federal law provides for civil penalties of up to $100,000 for each violation, and criminal penalties including fines of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years. 31 U.S.C. § 5322 and 31 U.S.C. § 1010.840. Further, enforcement actions for sub-standard AML compliance on the part of the filing institution can go hand-in-hand with charges of an unauthorized SAR disclosure-- once the SAR is in the public eye and no longer confidential.

The key is always to err on the side of non-disclosure.  Once a SAR is disclosed, it can’t be undone, and if disclosure was improper, penalties will no doubt follow. Further, the conduct of the institution in connection with the leak of the SAR, as well as in the underlying handling of the transactions at issue, create significant risk to the company and its employees.  Simply put, make certain that you have a valid reason to disclose any SAR-related information, and seek legal guidance if there is any uncertainty whatsoever.

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Authors

Eoin P. Beirne

Member / Co-chair, White Collar Defense and Government Investigations Practice

Eóin P. Beirne is a white collar defense lawyer at Mintz. He guides clients from a wide range of industries through investigations and enforcement proceedings and represents them in state and federal courts. Eóin handles matters related to health care fraud, public corruption, and insider trading.
Cory S. Flashner is a Mintz Member and former federal and state prosecutor whose white collar defense practice includes advising clients on securities and anti-money laundering laws and regulations.

Pete S. Michaels

Member / Co-Chair, Financial Services Practice

Pete S. Michaels is a Mintz attorney who focuses his practice on securities litigation, regulatory proceedings involving financial service companies and products, and compliance matters. He represents financial services firms and insurance companies and their employees, directors, and officers.

Jason Burrell