Skip to main content

Anne-Marie D. Dao


[email protected]



Anne-Marie represents clients in a wide variety of intellectual property, complex commercial, real estate, and class action defense matters. Anne-Marie’s litigation experience includes trademark infringement, copyright infringement, defense of corporate clients against class action suits alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and representing clients in lease disputes in both federal and state court.

Anne-Marie also counsels litigation clients on various business issues and manages disputes through alternative dispute resolution.

Before joining the firm, Anne-Marie was a litigation associate at a law firm in Silicon Valley. There, her work focused on trademark, trade secrets, and copyright litigation as well as complex commercial litigation. She also was in charge of the firm’s pro bono program.

Prior to law school, Anne-Marie worked as an honors paralegal specialist in the Telecommunications and Media Enforcement Section of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.


  • University of California - Davis (JD)
  • University of California - Irvine (BA, with honors)


  • Member, J. Clifford Wallace Inn of Court
  • Former Executive Committee Member, Intellectual Property Law Section, State Bar of California
  • Former Social Media Liaison, Intellectual Property Law Section, State Bar of California
  • 9th Circuit Reporter, New Matter, Intellectual Property Law Section, State Bar of California
  • Chair, Litigation Interest Group, Intellectual Property Law Section, State Bar of California


- French

- Vietnamese



Monthly TCPA Digest – January 2019

January 16, 2019| Article

This TCPA Digest covers an FCC petition on how the TCPA defines telemarketing and dual purpose and an Eighth Circuit holding for an insurance carrier based on record-keeping.

Monthly TCPA Digest – December 2018

December 17, 2018| Article

This TCPA Digest examines recently introduced Congressional bills focused on combatting robocalls and the FCC’s order to establish a single reassigned numbers database.

Monthly TCPA Digest – November 2018

November 19, 2018| Article

This TCPA Digest covers the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic case and provides news from the FCC, including a notice to voice providers that action will be taken if the industry-led call authentication system doesn’t materialize soon.
Read about recent TCPA cases and FCC comment periods on automatic telephone dialing systems, call blocking technologies, and a proposed emergency use exemption to the TCPA.
In this issue, we look at industry comments on the FCC’s report on robocalling and efforts to urge the agency to reconsider its reassigned numbers database proposal. In addition, we examine a recent circuit split on what constitutes an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) in the Third and Ninth Circuits and what that means for TCPA defendants. The split follows the D.C. Circuit’s May 2018 decision in ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission, which set aside the FCC’s “unreasonably expansive interpretation” of what constitutes an automatic telephone dialing system.

This issue provides insurance information for companies facing TCPA lawsuits and identifies the types of policies and provisions that may offer coverage. You will also find an update on the status of the proposed reassigned numbers database as well as information about a new FCC Public Notice, released August 10. Comments on the Public Notice are expected to lay the groundwork for the FCC’s next major action on call blocking and methods to eliminate illegal robocalls.

This issue includes an update on activity at the FCC, specifically the agency’s progress in evaluating comments received in several ongoing TCPA proceedings. In addition, in our Class Action Update, we look at the current understanding of what constitutes an ATDS and why, in the wake of ACA International, it may be more difficult for plaintiffs to demonstrate that the companies they are suing used ATDS devices.

After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia released its highly anticipated decision in ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission, courts have been addressing issues raised in that case. We previously summarized the opinion — which raises four issues, one of which is what constitutes an Automatic Telephone Dialing System (“ATDS”).
In this issue, we look at recent TCPA-related activity at the FCC, including the agency’s reevaulation of some TCPA rulings as well as a notable fine levied against a robocaller for malicious spoofing. In addition, in our Class Action & Litigation Update, we look at recent district court rulings offering different interpretations of what constitutes an ATDS, and consider where this split between the circuits leaves TCPA defendants.

This month we consider the Ninth Circuit’s pending Crunch ruling and how the decision may affect parties defending TCPA cases. You’ll find the story in our Class Action & Litigation Update. Our Legislative Update offers a quick review of the recent US House and Senate hearings on illegal robocalls. For a roundup of TCPA-related developments at the FCC, please see our Regulatory Update.



Essential Copyright: It's What You Need to Know

The State Bar of California

Universal Hilton 555 Universal Hollywood Drive, Universal City, CA