Skip to main content

Michelle L. Caton

Associate

[email protected]

+1.202.434.7441

Share:

Michelle focuses her practice on life sciences and health care transactions and health care compliance matters.

She advises pharmacies, PBMs, plans, and other stakeholders on a variety of drug supply chain issues. Michelle has experience drafting and negotiating PBM services agreements, rebate contracts, pharmacy services agreements, clinical trial agreements, and pharmaceutical support services contracts.

Michelle counsels clients on HIPAA compliance issues and represents clients before regulators in HIPAA compliance matters.    

Prior to joining Mintz, Michelle was an associate in the Government Contracts group and subsequently the Health Care Regulatory group of another large law firm, where she advised clients on a variety of regulatory and compliance issues. Michelle drafted, reviewed, and negotiated contracts relating to specialty pharmacy services and distribution arrangements, 340B program participation, pharmaceutical support services, and related matters. She also worked on health care transactions, drafted organizational policies and procedures, and prepared communications to the Food and Drug Administration.

While in law school, Michelle was a legal intern with the Department of Homeland Security, first in Immigration and Customs Enforcement and later in the Transportation Security Administration.

Before pursuing her legal career, Michelle held project management positions for companies in Oregon and Maine.

Education

  • George Mason University (JD, magna cum laude)
  • University of Maine (BA, summa cum laude)

Experience

  • Represented a large health benefits plan in preparing an RFP and negotiating the resultant PBM Services Agreement.
  • Represented a specialty pharmacy in negotiating pharmacy services and distribution agreements with multiple pharmaceutical manufacturers.
  • Represented a HIPAA covered entity in responding to requests from the Department of Health & Human Services Office for Civil Rights relating to data breach involving protected health information.

Involvement

  • Member, American Health Lawyers Association
  • Member, American Bar Association
  • Member, Military Spouse J.D. Network

Viewpoints

Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

HIPAA 2021 – What Can We Expect?

December 28, 2020 | Blog | By Dianne Bourque, Ellen Janos, Michelle Caton

As we’re all painfully aware, public health issues dominated 2020 and with the country’s attention focused on COVID-19 testing, status, transmission and care, HIPAA went mainstream. Health information became critical not only for health care providers, but for all manner of businesses, employers, property owners, and the national media. HIPAA – or more often than not “HIPPA” – was frequently touted in the news and on social media as the reason why COVID-related information could or could not be shared. As we head into 2021 with the pandemic raging on, the vaccination program underway, and a new administration taking over, here is a look at what we expect for “HIPPA” in 2021.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

HHS Keeps On Sprinting with Proposed Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule

December 14, 2020 | Blog | By Dianne Bourque, Michelle Caton

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is pushing ahead in its Regulatory Sprint to Coordinated Care with a new proposed rule, announced by HHS’ Office for Civil Rights on December 10, to modify the HIPAA Privacy Rule. This proposed rule follows HHS’ 2018 Request for Information on Modifying HIPAA Rules to Improve Coordinated Care, which sought to identify regulatory impediments to value-based care presented by HIPAA. With this proposed rule, HHS aims to “reduce burden on providers and support new ways for them to innovate and coordinate care on behalf of patients, while ensuring that [HHS] uphold[s] HIPAA’s promise of privacy and security,” according to HHS Deputy Secretary Eric Hargan. It would achieve these objectives through a variety of updates to the Privacy Rule, which we highlight in this blog post, along with initial reactions from our HIPAA privacy team.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail
This third post in our multi-part series on the final rules examines the three new AKS safe harbors and four new Stark Law exceptions that offer protection for value-based arrangements. The primary goal of these final rules is to reduce regulatory barriers and advance the health care industry’s transition to value-based care. Value-based care, often referred to as pay-for-performance, is a payment model that offers health care providers and suppliers financial incentives to meet certain performance measures that improve quality of care or appropriately reduce costs, as opposed to traditional fee-for-service or capitated payments healthcare reimbursement.

Plus, we have prepared easy-to-read comparison charts breaking down the current, proposed, and final regulations. These comparison charts offer a quick way to get up to speed on these voluminous final rules and their many historic changes to the AKS and Stark Law.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

HHS Issues Controversial Drug Rebate Reform Final Rule

November 25, 2020 | Blog | By Theresa Carnegie, Michelle Caton

On Friday, November 20, the Administration took bold action by releasing a contentious rule designed to disrupt the drug supply chain status quo. The Pharmaceutical Rebates final rule will alter how drug discounts offered by pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors or their PBMs, and service fees paid by such manufacturers to PBMs, are treated for purposes of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). As we discuss in this alert, the policies set out in this final rule are not surprising, in light of other actions taken by the Trump Administration to date. However, the transformational effects the rule will have on the drug supply chain, coupled with a lack of consensus among lawmakers and industry stakeholders about the best approach to drug pricing reform, ensures that litigation of this new rule will inevitably ensue.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to upend our daily lives, the promise of a vaccine offers hope that life may, in the not-too-distant future, return to some version of normalcy. The path to getting a safe, accessible vaccine to market, however, presents a variety of its own challenges. As we’ve been exploring in our Bioethics in a Pandemic blog series, the pandemic has presented a host of bioethics issues pertinent to the vaccine development and distribution process. Mintz's Bridgette Keller recently shared her insights into how bioethics can (and should!) influence research and development at the M2D2 Challenge Awards. A video of her presentation is now available to view online.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

Trump Signs Executive Orders Aimed at Tying Domestic Drug Prices to Foreign Prices

September 15, 2020 | Blog | By Theresa Carnegie, Michelle Caton

President Trump has followed through on his threat to pharmaceutical manufacturers, signing new executive orders on Sunday that take a preliminary step toward the President’s goal of tying domestic drug prices to the prices manufacturers charge in foreign countries. The “Executive Order on Lowering Drug Prices by Putting America First” follows a trio of drug pricing-related executive orders the administration issued this past July. At that time, President Trump also signed a different executive order with the same name, but withheld the order in an attempt to force pharmaceutical manufacturers to the negotiating table. The President warned manufacturers that if they did not propose alternatives to lower drug pricing within 30 days, his administration would take action to implement its previously-abandoned plan to peg U.S. drug prices to foreign prices. Sunday’s order follows weeks of negotiations between the White House and drug manufacturers that have apparently not resulted in any mutually-acceptable proposals for lowering American drug prices.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

Bioethics in a Pandemic: The Public’s Role in COVID-19 Vaccination

September 9, 2020 | Blog | By Bridgette Keller, Michelle Caton

As we noted in our previous post, the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security (Center) has been hard at work studying and providing thought leadership regarding the COVID-19 pandemic from a variety of angles. The Center, in conjunction with Texas State University and the Working Group on Readying Populations for COVID-19 Vaccine, recently released a report exploring the public’s role in COVID-19 vaccination (Report). The Report provides recommendations to U.S. policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders about how to advance public understanding of, access to, and acceptance of vaccines that protect against COVID-19.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail
As we discussed in our previous blog post, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) released guidance this past June to address how health care providers could contact, in a HIPAA-compliant manner, recovered COVID-19 patients to provide them with information about donating blood and plasma to potentially help other COVID-19 patients. On August 24, OCR released an updated version of that guidance to address similar communications from health plans. The amended guidance provides that health plans may also reach out to recovered COVID-19 patients about blood and plasma donation, subject to the same restrictions applicable to health care providers.
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail
Clinical trial sponsors and principal investigators can consider themselves on notice that the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is poised to ramp up enforcement activity relating to responsible parties’ obligations regarding clinical trial registration and results reporting. In a new guidance it released on August 12, 2020, FDA outlines how it intends to identify parties who have failed to register a clinical trial on, or submit results to, the ClinicalTrials.gov databank, as required by the FDA Amendments Act of 2007 and final regulations promulgated in 2016 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Read more
Health Care Viewpoints Thumbnail

CMS Proposes Rule to Pave the Way for Value-Based Drug Purchasing

June 26, 2020 | Blog | By Theresa Carnegie, Ellyn Sternfield, Michelle Caton

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has taken another step to further the adoption of value-based purchasing within the health care industry. (Readers may recall the Department of Health & Human Services’ two proposed rules – one from CMS and another from the Office of Inspector General – issued late last year, aimed at reducing barriers to value-based arrangements, which we discussed here.) CMS released its new proposed rule to “support state flexibility to enter into innovative value-based purchasing arrangements (VBPs) with manufacturers, and to provide manufacturers with regulatory support to enter into VBPs with payers, including Medicaid.”
Read more