Skip to main content

Tinny T. Song


[email protected]



Tinny assists clients with addressing antitrust and competition issues in connection with federal and state matters, including compliance, government investigations, Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) merger review, and review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Tinny’s practice also involves private antitrust litigation, including class actions.

Prior to joining Mintz, Tinny was an associate in the antitrust practice of a law firm in New York, where he assisted clients in private antitrust litigation involving price-fixing, benchmark and commodities manipulation, pay-for-delay, market allocation, monopolization, and other alleged violations of antitrust laws.

He is a member of the ABA Antitrust Section’s Health Care & Pharmaceutical Committee and serves as an editor for the committee’s Health Care Antirust Week-in-Review.

During law school, Tinny was a research assistant at the Global Antitrust Institute in Arlington, Virginia and served as the associate articles editor for the George Mason Law Review


  • George Mason University (JD)
  • Virginia Polytechnic & State University (BA)


  • Member, Health Care & Pharmaceutical Committee, Antitrust Section, American Bar Association (2018 - Present)


Intellectual Property Viewpoints Thumbnail
In a recent decision in In Re Humira (Adalimumab) Antitrust Litigation), No. 19-cv-1873, Judge Shah of the Northern District of Illinois dismissed a consolidated class action complaint filed by U.S. purchasers of AbbVie Inc.’s blockbuster biologic drug Humira alleging that AbbVie had prevented manufacturers of competing biosimilar drugs (“biosimilars”) from entering the U.S. market in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.
Read more
Antitrust Viewpoint Thumbnail

In Application of American Express to Horizontal Merger Challenge, District Court Allows Merger of Airline Ticket Platforms

April 21, 2020 | Alert | By Joseph Miller, Bruce Sokler, Shawn Skolky, Tinny Song

Read about a federal district court in Delaware’s denial of the DOJ’s challenge under the Clayton Act of Sabre Corp.’s $360 million acquisition of Farelogix Inc.
Read more
Antitrust Viewpoint Thumbnail

U.S. Department of Justice Issues First COVID-19-Related Business Review Letter to Medical Supplies Distributors

April 6, 2020 | Blog | By Bruce Sokler, Joseph Miller, Shawn Skolky, Tinny Song

Back in March, we wrote a blog post regarding the FTC and DOJ’s joint statement on antitrust guidance for COVID-19 public health efforts. As part of the press release, the Agencies announced that companies could request an expedited staff opinion on requests for review of collaborative COVID-19-related business efforts. The Agencies would endeavor to respond to all requests within seven business days. On Saturday, the DOJ issued its first business review letter, allowing to come to fruition a joint effort by McKesson, Owens & Minor, Cardinal Health, Medline, and Henry Schein (the “Medical Supplies Distributors”) to expedite and increase manufacturing, sourcing, and distribution of personal-protective equipment (PPE) and COVID-19-related medication.
Read more