Michael is a skilled patent attorney and technology protection strategist. He works with both growing and established companies to create, manage, and improve patent portfolios both in the US and worldwide. He works closely with experts in key patent jurisdictions worldwide to maximize enforceability and business value of clients' intellectual property rights. Michael also advises clients on business-critical IP due diligence issues, patent portfolio valuation, and licensing agreements and has been instrumental in creative resolutions of potential IP roadblocks in high value transactions.
Clients rely on Michael’s extensive experience, accumulated over 20 years of legal practice, to navigate the nuances of patent procurement and enforcement in Europe, Asia, Australia, and North and South America. His skills in mining existing patent assets to enhance their value and in designing and implementing programs for protecting ongoing innovations are highly sought after by cutting edge technology companies.
Experience
- Michael leads the Mintz team responsible for development and management of the worldwide patent portfolio protecting current and future products of a market leading e-cigarette manufacturer. He applies innovative asset development strategies to leverage existing disclosures and on-going utility and design filings as part of an integrated, global strategy to interdict copycat products with a view toward market share protection and regulatory compliance.
- Michael co-manages a sizable portfolio for a market-leading German developer of database and business software products, and collaborates with other Mintz attorneys to develop and apply effective strategies for addressing the ever-changing patentability landscape for software-based inventions.
- Michael also co-manages the Mintz team that designs and implements a US and foreign patent program for one of the world's largest credit rating agencies, which is also a leader in fraud detection and other financial risk mitigation technology. The Mintz team has tailored the company's portfolio and filing strategies with a particular focus on jurisdiction and subject matter analysis to maximize the value of the company’s legal spend while securing protection in the markets where the company is most likely to achieve grant of valuable, enforceable assets.
viewpoints
Latest Post-Alice Guidance from the Federal Circuit
May 17, 2016 | Blog | By Michael Van Loy, Howard Wisnia
UPDATE: Subject Matter Eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 – Abstract Ideas
May 17, 2016 | Alert | By Michael Van Loy
Not Obvious to Combine for a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSITA)
May 3, 2016 | Blog | By Michael Van Loy, Monique Winters Macek
Patents 101: Protecting Innovations
March 23, 2016 | Article | By Michael Van Loy
Understanding the Current State of Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under § 101
November 19, 2015 | Blog | By Christina Sperry, Michael Van Loy
USPTO Issues Newly Updated Guidance on Subject Matter Eligibility that Further Clarifies Examination Standards under 35 U.S.C. §101 in Light of Alice v. CLS Bank
August 4, 2015 | Alert | By Michael Van Loy
Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal on Grounds of Patent Ineligibility
July 1, 2015 | Blog | By Michael Van Loy, Monique Winters Macek
C.D. Cal. Swims Against the Tide of Software Patent Ineligibility in Caltech v. Hughes
December 31, 2014 | Blog | By Michael Van Loy, Inna Dahlin
USPTO Issues Interim Guidance on Patent Eligibility Under §101: Framework for Considering Whether Patents Are Eligible for US Patent Protection Significantly Improved
December 17, 2014 | Alert | By Michael Van Loy, Inna Dahlin
News & Press
Events & Speaking
USPTO Post-Grant Patent Trials 2018: Change & Recalibration
Practising Law Institute
PLI California Center 685 Market Street San Francisco, CA
Recognition & Awards
Best Lawyers in America: Patent Law (2021-2024)
Included on the San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Star: Intellectual Property list (2016)