
Brad is an experienced patent litigator and strategic counselor to start-up ventures and established businesses in the mechanical, electrical, and computer arts and a wide array of clean technologies. He represents clients before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in federal district and appellate courts across the country. With a background in mechanical engineering and over 18 years of experience, Brad has successfully advised clients on patent portfolio growth and management and protected the rights of patent owners against infringers and invalidity challenges, as well as defend individuals and businesses against charges of infringement and related allegations.
Brad has served as both lead and co-counsel before judges and juries in United States district courts, the International Trade Commission and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, where he has successfully defended patent owners’ rights against inter partes review challenges.
Brad is a Member of the Firm’s Energy & Sustainability Practice with a focus on representing clean technology clients in all aspects of intellectual property, licensing and technology growth, management and protection. He also co-chairs the Firm’s Post Grant Proceedings Practice and is co-editor of Mintz’ IP blog. In his spare time, he is the bassist for the 8-piece jump-blues band, The Slicked-Up 9’s, and New York rock act, The Incumbents.
Experience
- Served as lead counsel on behalf of the plaintiffs in a 10-day jury trial concerning patent infringement, involving passive electronic components, in the Eastern District of New York. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, finding infringement of both asserted patents (Am. Tech. Ceramics Corp. et al. v. Presidio Components, Inc., 14-06544-KAM (E.D.N.Y. 2014)
- Representing an owner of patents directed to assembly and fastening technologies against automotive manufacturers and suppliers in the District of Delaware (Wildcat Licensing WI LLC v. General Motors et al., 1:19-cv-00833-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00834-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00839-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00840-MN-JLH ,1:19-cv-00842-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00843-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00844-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00845-MN-JLH, 1:19-cv-00846-MN-JLH) (D. Del.))
- Serving as lead defense counsel in class action cases on behalf of Peter Thomas Roth Labs, LLC concerning false advertising allegations in the realm of cosmetics under various California, New York, Florida and Washington consumer laws (Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC at el. v. Miller et al., 19-698 (N.D. Cal.); Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC et al. v. Clair, 20-1220 (S.D.N.Y.))
- Represented Intellectual Ventures II LLC in IPR proceedings concerning encapsulated stator motor technology (IPR2017-01537, IPR2017-01558)
- Co-lead counsel for complainant in Certain Thermoplastic-Encapsulated Electric Motors, Components Thereof, and Products and Vehicles Containing Same (337-TA-1052)
- Represented Patent Owners American Technical Ceramics Corp. and AVX Corporation in IPR proceedings concerning technology for multilayer capacitor structures (IPR2015-01330, IPR2015-01331)
- Represented Patent Owner Footbalance System Oy in IPR proceedings concerning shoe insoles (Petition denied in IPR2015-01770; all claims upheld in IPR2015-01769)
- Represented owner of electronic payment system patents in patent infringement litigation (MoneyCat v. PayPal, Inc., 14-2490 (N.D. Cal.))
- Represented and achieved successful settlement for video-game developer and manufacturer in four-patent infringement litigation concerning motion-controlled video gaming (Shinsedai Co. Ltd. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., 11-2799 (S.D. Cal.))
- Allergan, Inc. v. Photomedex, Inc., et al., 8:07-cv-01316 (CDCA) - Represented Jan Marini Skin Research Inc., Peter Thomas Roth, Inc., and Peter Thomas Roth Labs LLC in a patent infringement case relating to certain hair growth products.
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp., 07-893 (S.D. Cal.) – defended electrical components manufacturer in patent infringement action concerning multilayer capacitors.
- Served as lead counsel on behalf of the defendant in direct-competitor, 2-patent infringement litigation involving aesthetic laser technology and successfully drove the parties’ disputes to settlement in eight months and prior to the start of expert discovery. Solta Medical, Inc. v. Lumenis, Inc. et al., No. 19-11600-DJC (D. Mass. 2019).
viewpoints
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — August 2023
August 29, 2023 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — March 2023
March 23, 2023 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Mintz EnergyTech Update: New Hydrogen Patents Data Released
March 9, 2023 | Blog | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — December 2022
December 13, 2022 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — November 2022
November 14, 2022 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — October 2022
October 13, 2022 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — September 2022
September 6, 2022 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Energy & Sustainability IP Updates — August 2022
August 8, 2022 | Article | By Brad M Scheller
Lost Profits – Who’s Sale is it Anyway?
August 1, 2022 | Blog | By Brad M Scheller, Robert Sweeney
Rule 11—Use It Wisely
July 20, 2022 | Blog | By Brad M Scheller, Robert Sweeney
News & Press
PTAB Case Highlights Power Of Nonobviousness Arguments
April 24, 2020
AIA Claim Construction Change To Spur Revamped Strategies
October 11, 2018
The Current State of IPR Estoppel
January 5, 2018
Mintz Partner Plays More Than One Tune
July 20, 2017
Cuozzo and Its Likely Impact
July 6, 2016
Brad Scheller (Mintz): “The unitary patent will be devalued to an extent because of the UK exit”
June 28, 2016
Events & Speaking
Recognition & Awards
- Included on the New York Super Lawyers: Rising Stars - Intellectual Property Litigation list (2014 - 2018)