Employment

It’s already hard enough for California employers to keep track of and comply with the myriad federal and state background check laws.

The employment practices risk profile for companies that employ members of the same family may have just increased as a result of Dillon v. NED Management, Inc., a decision out of the Eastern District of New York.

Two NFL teams are facing wage and hour class action lawsuits filed by their cheerleaders. On January 22, an Oakland Raiderette sued the Raiders organization on behalf of herself and current and former cheerleaders alleging that the Raiders violated a slew of California labor laws.

Last week, my colleague and Chair of Mintz Levin's Immigration practice, Susan Cohen, published an alert addressing H-1B visa petitions.  The takeaway: do not delay in identifying H-1B candidates and initiating the petition process.

Don Schroeder, one of our labor law attorneys, was recently quoted in a Corporate Counsel article discussing the National Labor Relations Board complaint filed against Wal-Mart over alleged threats to employees engaged in company protests. In particular, the article examines Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act and whether it applies to the complaint.

The Treasury Department and the IRS last week issued long-awaited final rules implementing the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility (a/k/a “pay-or-play”) rules. Originally slated to take effect beginning January 1, 2014, enforcement was delayed a full year by IRS Notice 2013-45.

On this Valentine’s Day I thought it would be a good idea to share an article that my partner Jen Rubin wrote a couple of years back.  It remains required reading to this day for employers trying to effectively manage their employees’ workplace romances.

Anti-poaching agreements, non-recruitment pacts, no-hire contracts, whatever you want to call them, require a protectable interest to be enforceable in New York. That’s what a Southern District of New York judge in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. TransUnion Holding Company, Inc. held.

A January 18th New York Times article (Rules for Equal Coverage by Employers Remain Elusive Under Health Law) reported on the progress, or lack thereof, of the adoption of group health plan non-discrimination regulations under the Affordable Care Act’s insurance market reforms.

Breaking with long standing tradition—i.e., issuing important rules on a Friday before a holiday weekend, or (failing that) any Friday (hence the reference to Week 45½ in this post)—the Treasury Department and the IRS today issued a 227-page final regulation under the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility (a/k/a “pay-or-play”) rules.

Last week the Colorado Supreme Court decided to review a 2013 appellate court decision holding that Colorado employers may lawfully terminate employees for their off-duty use of medical marijuana even if they are not impaired on the job.

Members of the Northwestern University football team have signed a petition with the National Labor Relations Board seeking recognition as a collective bargaining unit.

Another important ACA-related alert from Alden J. Bianchi: this time regarding the important changes related to the regulation of “excepted benefits.”

The W-2 reporting rules have been in effect for a while, and I do not address them in this post. This post instead addresses Code §§ 6055 and 6056, which were originally slated to take effect in 2014, but which were subsequently delayed by one year in IRS Notice 2013-45.

A handful of recent guidance items that the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury have issued make some important changes related to the regulation of “excepted benefits.”

Our tax law colleague, Jonathan Talansky, discusses a recent tax court decision discussing that dreaded concept of “substantial risk of forfeiture” under section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code.

That's what one study by RiseSmart, a outplacement and recruiting firm, suggests. According to the study, the team hailing from the city with a lower unemployment rate prevailed in 20 of the last 25 Super Bowls.

This week the Supreme Court held that time unionized workers spend putting on (donning) and taking off (doffing) personal protective gear is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The decision comes on the heels of a recent rise in donning and doffing collective action cases and will have a significant impact on employers with unionized employees.

Market disrupters always make news. Uber, which claims to be a tech company, created a smart-phone application that connects drivers of “black cars”, or livery cars, with passengers, and processes the payment with the passenger’s pre-registered credit card, all in exchange for 20% of the fare.

Today, as expected, the City Council formally introduced a bill to amend its existing paid sick leave law.  You can access the proposed amendments here.