Nicholas is a trial lawyer focusing on trade secret litigation who combines practical advice with deep experience to deliver results for clients. Nicholas has long experience representing clients in federal and state court, and at the International Trade Commission, where his practice covers all aspects of IP litigation with a focus on cases concerning allegations of trade secret misappropriation. Nicholas has delivered results for clients in a variety of technology areas, including network devices, semiconductors, consumer electronics, medical devices, and manufacturing devices. Mindful of the business realities of litigation, Nicholas actively fights for clients toward successful results in bet-the-company litigation while working simultaneously to counsel clients toward efficient and effective business results in pre-suit dispute resolution efforts. Nicholas’ practice also encompasses advising on the proactive protection and management of trade secret assets – often amongst a company’s most valuable assets.
Nicholas brings robust courtroom experience to his trade secret litigation practice. Aside from his trial work at Mintz, while a Special Assistant District Attorney in the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office, Nicholas prosecuted over 150 criminal matters, trying many in jury and bench trials. Nicholas also maintains an active pro bono practice where he has represented numerous asylum seekers, among other matters, and has appeared before both trial and appellate courts.
Prior to joining Mintz, Nick worked for Hon. Ralph D. Gants, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and Hon. Patti B. Saris, Chief Judge of the US District Court, District of Massachusetts. Nicholas also played soccer professionally before going to law school.
Experience
Recent Trade Secret Litigation and Related Matters
- Successfully defended pharmaceutical start-up company facing claims of trade secret misappropriation related to glycol-immunology used to treat various human disorders associated with cancer and inflammation.
- Successfully obtained injunctive relief against Chinese entities accused of misappropriating trade secrets related to medical X-ray devices on behalf of a multi-national medical devices company.
- Successfully represented company in the business of producing hi-frequency and hi-power chips concerning allegations of trade secret misappropriation against former joint development partner.
- Successfully defended start-up medical device company against claims of trade secret misappropriation by larger multi-national medical device company operating in same technology space.
- Successfully obtained partial summary judgment on behalf of multi-national business intelligence company against defendants’ counterclaims in matter where client alleged trade secret misappropriation against former employees and a competing firm they established.
- Represent business consulting firm in claims for unlawful use of proprietary and confidential information utilized improperly by former customer of client.
- Successfully advised client in the microchip development space concerning allegations of trade secret misappropriation against a former employee toward a pre-suit resolution of the dispute that avoided the need for litigation.
- Successfully advised client that provides human resources technology solutions concerning the misappropriation of trade secret information by a former employee toward a pre-suit resolution of the dispute that avoided the need for litigation.
- Successfully advised client in the business of providing temporary staffing solutions toward a resolution of allegations of trade secret misappropriation by multiple former employees shortly following the filing of suit against former employees.
- Successfully advised client in the business of cellular communications technology in the defense of allegations of trade secret misappropriation.
- Successfully advised client in the business of waste management technology in responding to demand correspondence alleging trade secret misappropriation towards avoidance of litigation.
- Advised life sciences client in the implementation of reasonable measures to protect trade secret assets.
Recent Patent Litigation
- Successfully represent plaintiff in a case alleging infringement of patents on the synthesis of quantum dots, and the use of quantum dot film resins in televisions and other electronic display devices, obtaining a $150,000,000 million settlement.
- Successfully represented defendant in patent litigation alleging infringement of patents concerning self-righting aeronautical vehicles.
- Represented Complainant in an ITC investigation adverse to a number of consumer electronics companies alleging infringement of patents related to the operation of smartphones.
viewpoints
Steps Your Company Should Consider Now to Protect Value with a Wave of Trade Secret Litigation on the Horizon Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, Economic Downturn, and Jobless Claims
April 17, 2020 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nicholas Armington
Federal Judge Confirms that Federal Trade Secret Statute Applies to Misappropriation that Occurs Overseas
March 11, 2020 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nicholas Armington
Mintz Rings in 2020 with Top 10 Recognition for ITC Practice
January 6, 2020 | Blog
Criminal Statute for Organized Crime Now Available to Combat Trade Secret Theft – But What is an Act of Trade Secret Theft under Civil RICO?
June 18, 2019 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nicholas Armington
Massachusetts Adopts Uniform Trade Secrets Act
September 6, 2018 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nicholas Armington
District Court Grants Protection under DTSA Whistleblower Immunity for First Time
April 6, 2018 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nick Armington
International Trade Commission Becomes Even More Potent Venue for Victims of Trade Secret Misappropriation
January 30, 2018 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nick Armington
Potential Future Harm to Patent Holder Found to Justify Imposition of Preliminary Injunction
November 8, 2017 | Blog | By Andrew DeVoogd, Nick Armington
DTSA Does Not Create a Private Civil Cause of Action for Conspiracy to Commit Trade Secret Theft
September 25, 2017 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nick Armington
DTSA and Ex Parte Seizure – Lessons from the First Ex Parte Seizure Under The DTSA
August 21, 2017 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Nick Armington
News & Press
Twenty-Five Mintz Attorneys Named To Boston Magazine’s Top Lawyers List
November 21, 2023
Trade Secret Litigation Soars In The Life Sciences Industry
October 2, 2023
I Spy a Trade Secret: Conducting Proper Trade Secret Asset Management Review To Avoid Sufficiency Failure In Litigation
July 12, 2023
Watching The DTSA Court Split On Inevitable Disclosure
October 18, 2022
The Defend Trade Secrets Act: A Powerful New Tool for Employers
October 25, 2016
Events & Speaking
Trade Secret Threat Looms Due to Economic Downturn: Protecting and enforcing trade secrets in the COVID era
View the Webinar Recording
Trade Secrets: The Legal and Economic Implications of DTSA
Berkeley Research Group, 1800 M Street NW, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
The Defend Trade Secrets Act: Rising Developments and Trends Employers Should Know
The Knowledge Group
Webinar
Data Protection at the Intersection of Trade Secrets and Cybersecurity
Boston Patent Law Association
Mintz Levin One Financial Center Boston, MA
The Defend Trade Secrets Act: A Powerful Tool for Companies to Protect Their Trade Secrets
myLawCLE
Webinar
Recognition & Awards
Listed in Boston Magazine’s Top Lawyers (2023)
Involvement
- Member, Sedona Conference Working Group 12 for Trade Secrets