Health Care

Last week I attended the American Health Lawyers Association Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues in Baltimore, Maryland. Taking a comprehensive approach to reimbursement issues, the program offered a variety of sessions ranging from Medicare and Medicaid program fundamentals to areas of highly-specific technical expertise.

New York’s Emergency Medical Services and Surprise Bills law went into effect yesterday, which means consumers who receive out of network (OON) emergency services will no longer have to pay more than their usual in-network obligations, regardless of the network status of the treating physician, and any disputed portions of the bill must be settled by the physician and the health plan.

A divided Supreme Court ruled by a 5-4 margin on March 31st that providers may not sue in federal court over the adequacy of state Medicaid rates. The decision in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc. has important implications well beyond the narrow group of providers of “habilitation” services for the mentally retarded in the state of Idaho.

ML Strategies has posted its weekly Health Care Update.  This week’s Health Care Update focuses on the latest Congressional developments on the repeal of the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate (“SGR”), commonly known as the “Doc-Fix” and the Children's Health Insurance Program (“CHIP”) reauthorization.

The waves of change affecting health care providers include reimbursement and funding developments, the impact of the Affordable Care Act, technological and medical advances, provider network design transformations imposed by payors — and antitrust.

A small regional hospital’s antitrust suit alleging illegal exclusive dealing and attempted monopolization against its largest competitor will move forward following a district court’s denial of the defendant hospital’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Yesterday the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services  (the “OIG”) issued Advisory Opinion 15-04 (“Advisory Opinion”) in which it found that an exclusive arrangement between a laboratory and a physician practice could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the Anti-Kickback Statute.

This week, two of Mintz health law attorneys will speak at the American Health Lawyers Association Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues in Baltimore, Maryland.

Recently, HHS-OIG announced a first-of-its-kind settlement over pharmaceutical manufacturer reporting of Average Sales Price (ASP).  Sandoz, Inc. agreed to pay a civil monetary penalty of $12.64 million for alleged failure to submit accurate ASP data to CMS.

On March 19th, Representative Michael C. Burgess, M.D. (R-TX) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) unveiled a bipartisan plan to repeal and replace the sustainable growth rate (SGR) physician payment system for physician reimbursement under Medicare.

ML Strategies has posted its weekly Health Care Update. This publication provides timely information on implementation of the Affordable Care Act, Congressional initiatives affecting the health care industry, and federal and state health regulatory developments.

Mintz’s Health Care Enforcement Defense Practice has published its most recent Qui Tam Update, highlighting two qui tam cases unsealed in November and December of 2014 and giving an overview of the other 17 cases unsealed during the same time period.

Last week, I had the honor of participating in a panel discussion about how health care entities deal with reported compliance concerns at the ABA’s 16th Annual Conference on Emerging Issues in Healthcare Law.

In a highly anticipated announcement on Tuesday, March 10, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released details for a new Accountable Care Organization (ACO) program called the Next Generation ACO (NGACO). 

ML Strategies has posted its weekly Health Care Update. This publication provides timely information on implementation of the Affordable Care Act, Congressional initiatives affecting the health care industry, and federal and state health regulatory developments.

Despite the efforts of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to combat fraud and contain costs in federal healthcare programs, Medicare’s fee-for-service program (Parts A and B)  and Medicaid were two of the top three culprits for the billions reported to have been improperly paid by the federal government in fiscal year 2014.

As a final addition to our series on the 2016 Draft Call Letter, we highlight some of the MA contracting issues raised by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (“CMS”).

Mother Nature claimed another victim this week. The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health was scheduled to hold a hearing on March 5, 2015 – Examining the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

For the last of our series on the 2016 Draft Call Letter, we focus on the provisions impacting plans serving Medicare-Medicaid, or dual eligible, enrollees. As we have previously posted, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has struggled with how to provide high quality, seamless care to dual eligible individuals.

In past Call Letters, CMS has proposed and finalized significant changes to the Medicare Advantage risk adjustment system including, recalibrations, deletions and additions of diagnoses codes, and questioning of the value of in-house health risk assessments.