Skip to main content

Paul M. Huston

Member

[email protected]

+1.858.314.1549

Share:

Paul is an accomplished employment litigator and counselor. Representing clients from around the world, he has developed a particular expertise in employee mobility issues, including disputes relating to trade secrets, unfair competition, and restrictive covenants. Paul’s work has created new case law clarifying the enforceability of restrictive covenants, particularly against individuals working for California employers.

Paul represents both employers and executives in a broad spectrum of employment disputes, including matters involving breach of contract, sexual harassment, disability discrimination, and Equal Pay Act claims. Paul also has significant experience litigating large wage and hour class actions and PAGA representative actions. His practice encompasses all stages of administrative, trial court, and appellate litigation.

In addition to representing clients in litigation and before administrative agencies, Paul counsels clients on pre-litigation matters and risk mitigation, partnering with them to create and implement compliance best practices that best align with the organization’s business needs and HR strategies. He has significant experience in contract formation, independent contractor agreements, executive employment agreements, arbitration agreements, and class action waivers.

Experience

  • Representing an international energy company, Paul crafted briefs that resulted in the dismissal of federal noncompete claims against Filipino workers in California and ultimately a published decision stating there is no “trade secret exception” to the ban on noncompetes in California. (Northern District of California)
  • After a two-week jury trial, Paul and the defense trial team obtained a full defense jury verdict in a defamation suit brought by a former employee against a third-party defendant whose statements to the employer allegedly resulted in the employee’s termination. (San Diego Superior Court)
  • Representing an executive and the executive’s new employer, Paul and the Mintz team successfully obtained summary judgment on non-competition claims, creating new published case law relating to the enforceability of foreign choice of law clauses against California workers. (Chancery Court of Delaware)
  • In a disability discrimination case, Paul and the Mintz defense team obtained terminating sanctions against a former employee, and subsequently an award of defendant’s attorneys’ fees, after discovering the employee’s intentional destruction of evidence during litigation and unsuccessful attempt to conceal the same. (Los Angeles Superior Court)
  • In a suit by a former employer against its former executive and the executive’s new technology startup, Paul and the Mintz defense team obtained dismissal of trade secret theft claims and successfully defeated related discovery motions. (Southern District of California)
  • Representing an international medical company, Paul and the Mintz defense team obtained summary judgment against an employee’s federal age discrimination and breach of contract claims after the employee was terminated for poor performance and alleged that the employer had a policy requiring progressive discipline. (Central District of California)
  • Negotiated various favorable settlements and broad liability releases while representing transportation companies during the yearslong “Port Trucking” litigation in Los Angeles, including after weeks-long trials before the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. (Los Angeles Superior Court)
  • Representing a surgeon’s office, Paul worked with forensic experts to uncover evidence that led to the defense team negotiating a nothing-paid full dismissal of an employee’s frivolous harassment and retaliation claims after internal due diligence revealed the employee had apparently stolen company trade secrets. (San Diego Superior Court)
  • Drafted the briefs that led to the dismissal of trade secret claims against a nationwide staffing agency for failure to accurately specify what protectable trade secrets had been allegedly taken. (Southern District of California)
Read less

viewpoints

AI Prompt Injections: An Emerging Risk for Employers

July 13, 2026 | Blog | By Kevin Kim, Paul Huston

A recent case from Brazil illustrates a developing category of AI risk with direct implications for U.S. businesses.  The court fined two lawyers for embedding a prompt injection into a court petition to manipulate the court’s AI tools.  The lawyers in question inserted invisible text (white letters on a white background) directing the court’s AI systems to review their petition, but not challenge it, regardless of any other instructions it was given.  The court discovered the hidden command, characterized it as an attempted manipulation of its AI systems, and sanctioned the lawyers. 

Read more

Join Mintz attorneys Jen Rubin, Paul Huston, Kevin Kim, Evan Piercey, and Nikki Rivers for a timely and insightful webinar exploring the complex and often conflicting landscape of California employment law. Designed for employers navigating the challenges of employing individuals in California, this webinar will cover recent developments including multi-jurisdictional non-compete enforcement, the latest California employment law updates, evolving DEI mandates, and the growing tensions between federal and state regulations. We’ll also examine upcoming legislative changes, the expanding role of AI in the workplace, and new obligations under the California Privacy Protection Act. Whether you're based in California, have employees who are, or simply are impacted by its far-reaching legal standards, this webinar will equip you with the tools to stay compliant and competitive.

Read more

As the workplace continues to take a new shape, the distinction between “workplace conduct” and “off duty” conduct continues to fade for many.  After a recent Ninth Circuit ruling, employers must be more vigilant than ever in monitoring and responding to employee social media postings, even when they are personal and “off duty.”

Read more

A New Chapter in California’s Ongoing PAGA is Lava Saga: PAGA Reform

July 3, 2024 | Blog | By Jennifer Rubin, Paul Huston, Kevin Kim

Major changes to PAGA are now official. Most importantly:

  • Employees must have experienced each of the alleged violations to have standing to sue;
  • Employers can correct inaccuracies on paystubs without penalty; and 
  • Employers who take specific steps to prevent Labor Code violations will be able to substantially reduce liability. 
Read more

A New Dawn (Maybe) for California Employers: State and Business Groups Strike Deal on PAGA Reform

June 20, 2024 | Blog | By Jennifer Rubin, Paul Huston, Mike Flesuras

On June 18, 2024, Governor Newsom, in collaboration with legislative leaders, unveiled a landmark agreement to reform the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). 

Read more

California’s Highest Court Revisits Statutory PAGA Standing: What the Ruling Means for California Employers

July 25, 2023 | Blog | By Jennifer Rubin, Paul Huston, Nicole Rivers, Mike Flesuras

Read more

Pay Range(r)s: A (Pocket) Field Guide to Pay Transparency

October 17, 2022 | Blog | By Paul Huston, Jennifer Rubin

California has now joined New York City and Colorado in requiring employers (for Golden State employers, of 15 or more) to publish “pay scales” in job postings. As with many things California, however, the new law (which becomes effective on January 1, 2023) regulates, but doesn’t guide. Pay transparency may be a worthy goal to effectuate parity, but employers face more questions than the new mandate answers. Mintz attorneys Paul Huston and Jen Rubin developed a field guide for pay “rangers” to help human resource professionals tackle this new law.

Read more

Cal/OSHA Revised Guidance Effective January 14, 2022

January 13, 2022 | Blog | By Nicole Rivers, Paul Huston, Jennifer Rubin

Cal/OSHA revised its Emergency Temporary Standards (“ETS”) following its mid-December meeting and, more recently, made additional revisions to align with the California Department of Public Health’s recommendations.
Read more

(Updated) A Comprehensive Breakdown of OSHA’s COVID-19 Vaccination Rule

January 12, 2022 | Blog | By Michael Arnold, Jennifer Rubin, David Barmak, Corbin Carter, Evan Piercey, Danielle Bereznay, Danielle Dillon, Nicole Rivers, Paul Huston, Emma Follansbee

Read Mintz’s comprehensive analysis of OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard pertaining to workplace COVID-19 vaccination and testing requirements for employers with 100 or more employees.
Read more
Read less

podcasts

Explore how employers can protect trade secrets in an AI-driven workplace. In this Mintz On Air episode, Jen Rubin and Paul Huston discuss practical safeguards, AI risks, and accountability challenges, plus strategies for balancing innovation with security.

Read more

Member Jen Rubin is joined by Member Paul Huston in a conversation on performance evaluations, covering their importance, best practices, and legal significance.

Read more
Podcast Viewpoint Image

Reinventing the Employment Relationship: A Moderated Discussion about the Future of Work

February 15, 2023 | Podcast | By Jennifer Rubin, Geri Haight, Paul Huston

The worldwide pandemic, focus on social justice, sharp political divisions, quiet quitting and the Great Resignation are all events that have impacted and altered employment relationships. At the same time the modern workplace is becoming dispersed, virtual and vocal, workplace regulation – the laws that form the structure of the traditional employment relationship – is becoming even more challenging for employers struggling to meet the challenges of the next generation of workers.

Read more
Read less

Recognition & Awards

  • Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch – Litigation: Labor and Employment (2020 – 2025); Labor and Employment Law: Management (2023 – 2025)

  • Lawdragon: Litigation, Mobility (2026)

Read less