
Trademark & Copyright
Viewpoints
Filter by:
DJ Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars Get “Funked” With New Copyright Suit Over “Uptown Funk”
November 10, 2016 | Blog | By Brad M Scheller, Daniel Weinger, Anthony Faillaci
On Friday, October 28, 2016, musicians Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars were hit with a copyright infringement suit based on their wildly popular hit “Uptown Funk.”
Read more
Belmora Takes Its FLANAX Headache to the U.S. Supreme Court
October 25, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
Well, a lot has happened since we last reported on the District Court's decision in the FLANAX trademark dispute. As you may recall, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granted Bayer's Petition and cancelled the FLANAX registration although Bayer, a German company, did not use the mark FLANAX in the US.
Read more
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Redskins' Petition to Join SLANTS Case
October 3, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
Further to our post last Friday on the SLANTS trademark case, the U.S. Supreme Court today, without comment, refused the Redskins' Petition to join the SLANTS case challenging the U.S. Trademark Office's ban on "offensive" trademarks.
Read more
The SLANTS Trademark Will Play One More Gig: U.S. Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of Ban on Disparaging Trademarks
September 29, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will review whether the U.S. Trademark Office can deny registration of offensive trademarks or whether such prohibition violates the First Amendment.
Read more
IP For Start-Ups: Part V
July 5, 2016 | Blog | By Michael Van Loy
In our fifth "IP for Start-Ups” video, “Copyrights versus Patents to Protect Software Innovations”, Mike discusses the pros and cons of using copyrights or patents to protect your software.
Read more
Dilution Update: NYC BEER Is Not Diluted, But The Empire State Building Is
June 30, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
Trademark dilution is a concept not easily understood. Although, we have written about this topic in previous posts, a recent decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, ESRT Empire State Building, L. L. C. v. Michael Liang, Opposition No. 91204122 (TTAB June 17, 2016), may help to further explain why it is unacceptable to dilute another’s trademark.
Read more
DICKMAN'S Pickles: Just Another Unregistrable Surname
June 29, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
The US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has, again, explained how and when surnames may function as trademarks.
Read more
MAYA And MAYARI Are Not Confusingly Similar When Used On Wine
June 28, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
The Federal Circuit has upheld the findings of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board that use of the marks MAYA and MAYARI on wine is not likely to cause confusion.
Read more
Keep Calm and IP On: Planning for UK IP Post-Brexit
June 27, 2016 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Brad M Scheller
This past Thursday the Brexit vote sent shockwaves around world, including the IP community and in particular with respect to IP rights in the UK and Europe. But concerns at the moment are speculative as nothing yet has changed.
Read more
PETA Isn't Monkeying Around With Copyright Ownership Rights
March 23, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
As we reported in a recent post, PETA lost its efforts, on behalf of Naruto the monkey, to secure his claim to copyright ownership of his "selfie" photograph. The district court judge held that the copyright law did not recognize an animal's right to own a copyright.
Read more
Monkey See, Monkey Sue Doesn’t Fly Under U.S. Copyright Law
February 24, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
In August 2014, we posted about a copyright ownership dispute involving selfie photographs. The disputed selfie photographs were taken by a monkey named Naruto in Indonesia in 2011.
Read more
Washington Redskins Haven’t Won Yet: Why the Constitutionality of Section 2(a) is Not Yet Final
January 4, 2016 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller, Serge Subach
What do Washington D.C.’s NFL team, the Redskins, and Mr. Tam’s rock band, The Slants, have in common? Both have enjoyed unexpected victories recently and both have been called “disparaging” by the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”).
Read more
Federal Circuit Rules Federal Trademark Statute Ban on DIsparaging Marks to Be Unconstitutional
December 22, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
Today the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the section of the Lanham Act which bans registration of "disparaging" trademarks is an unconstitutional violation of First Amendment free speech.
Read more
When a Quirk of Copyright Law Creates a Christmas Classic: It’s a Wonderful Life and the Public Domain
December 17, 2015 | Blog | By Lisa Adams, Derek Constantine
George Bailey stands on a bridge begging for another chance at life. Upon being granted a second chance, he joyously runs home to embrace his family. As the community of Bedford Falls rallies around him and raises funds to save the endangered Building and Loan and George Bailey personally from an unjustified failure, someone proclaims a toast to George Bailey, “the richest man in town.”
Read more
A Scandalous Mark to Some, Free Speech to Others: Federal Circuit to Decide Whether Controversial Limit on Trademark Registrations Violates First Amendment
May 4, 2015 | Blog | By Serge Subach
The Federal Circuit has decided to revisit the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act in the case of In re Shiao Tam, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6840 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 27, 2015). Section 2(a) of the Lanham act allows the USPTO to reject the registration of a trademark that is immoral, scandalous, or disparaging.
Read more
…..and Don’t Even Think About Advertising a MARCH MADNESS Event Either!
March 17, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
It is that time of year again, coming off St. Patrick’s Day celebrations, when everyone gets on the college basketball bandwagon in the season of “MARCH MADNESS.”
Read more
Bayer Given a Headache by Trial Court Decision in FLANAX US Trademark Dispute
February 25, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
On February 6, 2015, a US District Court issued a ruling which underscores the territorial nature of trademark rights and the need to seek formal protection for your marks where possible in all countries of interest.
Read more
The Court's Decision in the FLANAX US Trademark Dispute Gives Bayer a Headache
February 25, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
On February 6, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. Belmora LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1623 (TTAB 2014) holding that Article 6bis of the Paris Convention does not grant trademark rights that are protectable under Section 14(3) (misrepresentation of source), Section 43(a)(1)(A) (infringement of an unregistered mark) and Section 43(a)(1)(B) (false advertising) of the United States Trademark Statute (the Lanham Act).
Read more
Use It or Lose It: When Can a Trademark Registered Under Section 44(e) or 66(a) Be Deemed “Abandoned” in the US?
February 3, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
Unlike most countries, US trademark law generally requires that a mark be in use before it can be protected. The US recognizes common law rights in unregistered marks if they have been adopted in good faith and are in actual use on a product or to provide a service to the public.
Read more
Trademarks and Branding: Need Some Ideas for that New Product Name?
January 27, 2015 | Blog | By Susan Neuberger Weller
The New York Times Magazine had a very interesting article in its January 18, 2014 issue entitled "Call It What It Is." The article, written by Neal Gabler, looks into the methods and ideologies used to create new product brand names.
Read more
Explore Other Viewpoints:
- Antitrust
- Appellate
- Arbitration, Mediation & Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Awards
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- Class Action
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Construction
- Consumer Product Safety
- Cross-Border Asset Recovery
- Debt Financing
- Diversity
- EB-5 Financing
- Education & Nonprofits
- Employment, Labor & Benefits
- Energy & Sustainability
- Environmental Enforcement Defense
- Environmental Law
- FDA Regulatory
- Federal Circuit Appeals
- Financial Institution Litigation
- Government Law
- Health Care
- Health Care Compliance, Fraud and Abuse, & Regulatory Counseling
- Health Care Enforcement & Investigations
- Health Care Transactions
- Health Information Privacy & Security
- IP Due Diligence
- IPRs & Other Post Grant Proceedings
- Immigration
- Insolvency & Creditor Rights Litigation
- Institutional Investor Class Action Recovery
- Insurance & Financial Services
- Insurance Consulting & Risk Management
- Insurance and Reinsurance Problem-Solving & Dispute Resolution
- Intellectual Property
- Investment Funds
- Israel
- Licensing & Technology Transactions
- Life Sciences
- Litigation & Investigations
- M&A Litigation
- ML Strategies
- Medicare, Medicaid and Commercial Coverage & Reimbursement
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Prosecution & Strategic Counseling
- Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Private Client
- Private Equity
- Pro Bono
- Products Liability & Complex Tort
- Project Development & Finance
- Public Finance
- Real Estate Litigation
- Real Estate Transactions
- Real Estate, Construction & Infrastructure
- Retail & Consumer Products
- Securities & Capital Markets
- Securities Litigation
- Sports & Entertainment
- Strategic IP Monetization & Licensing
- Tax
- Technology
- Technology, Communications & Media
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark & Copyright
- Trademark Litigation
- Venture Capital & Emerging Companies
- White Collar Defense & Government Investigations