On January 13, 2025, California Attorney General Rob Bonta (the California AG) issued two Legal Advisories regarding the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI). The first Legal Advisory provides guidance to consumers and entities developing, selling, and using AI describing their rights and obligations under California law. The second Legal Advisory, entitled Application of Existing California Law to Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (the Health Care Legal Advisory), is expressly directed at health care providers, insurers, vendors, investors, and other health care entities who develop, sell, and use AI and other automated decision-making tools.

Our 2025 edition of EnforceMintz reflects on health care enforcement trends, predicts how health care enforcement may evolve, and offers practical guidance about what these trends and predictions mean for health care providers, payors, and other stakeholders.

In 2024, DOJ resolved several noteworthy False Claims Act cases against hospitals and health systems, obtaining numerous large recoveries in cases where Stark Law and federal Anti-Kickback Statute violations served as a predicate for FCA claims.

In 2024, DOJ and the OIG expanded telehealth enforcement beyond traditional telefraud schemes, addressing compliance with state corporate practice and telehealth-specific billing codes. Two cases, including the first criminal telemedicine prosecution, signal a trend of heightened regulatory scrutiny for the maturing telehealth industry.

Governor Newsom signed over 1300 bills and vetoed almost 190 bills in 2024.  Consistent with prior years, in 2024, California enacted multiple laws significantly impacting the health care industry.  From artificial intelligence (AI) to providers to health plans, these new laws require proactive efforts to ensure on-going compliance.

We highlight below the most important of the heath care-focused bills passed during this year.  Unless otherwise noted, these new laws are effective January 1, 2025.

Telehealth companies and other industry stakeholders have had a watchful eye towards the end of 2024 and the impending “telehealth cliff” as COVID-era Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) flexibilities and Medicare expanded telehealth coverage are set to expire. Although a recent temporary joint rule from the DEA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) along with the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule has provided some hope, questions regarding telehealth access in 2025 and under a new Administration remain unclear. Further, calls continue for increased oversight of telehealth services. 

On September 28, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed California Assembly Bill 3129 (AB-3129) originally introduced by California Attorney General Rob Bonta (AG) and Assembly Speaker pro Tempore Jim Wood and passed by the California legislature earlier in the month.  While the California legislature can override the Governor’s veto, legislators likely will not take this extraordinary step, which has not been taken in several decades.

Read about different health care priorities that may be pursued by the presidential candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in the latest edition of our 2024 Pre-Election Analysis series on how the November 2024 election will impact the legislative and regulatory landscape.

The indictment, arrest, and arraignment of Ruthia He, the founder, CEO, and clinical president of Done Global (Done), and David Brody, clinical president of Done and the sole shareholder of Done Health, P.C. (PC) in connection with their alleged criminal conspiracy to distribute controlled substances, commit health care fraud, and obstruct justice may bring heightened scrutiny to behavioral health telemedicine companies and other virtual health platforms. The seven-count indictment represents the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) first criminal drug distribution prosecutions related to telemedicine prescribing. The prosecution of the defendants is proceeding in federal court in the Northern District of California and several additional Done personnel including an executive, physician, and nurse practitioners are similarly being prosecuted.

States are increasingly exercising regulatory oversight of health care transactions by enacting laws requiring prior notice or approval of certain health care transactions. Currently, 15 states have enacted health care transaction review laws applicable to for-profit transactions. On Wednesday, March 20, 2024, Mintz members Daniel A. Cody, Deborah A. Daccord, and Karen S. Lovitch engaged in an insightful discussion with Lois Johnson, General Counsel of Massachusetts Health Policy Commission, to discuss the latest developments surrounding these laws and gain valuable insight from Ms. Johnson’s expertise, as Massachusetts was one of the first states to implement a health care transaction review process. The highlights of this informative conversation are summarized below, and the webinar can be viewed here.