Joe is a seasoned antitrust attorney and Co-chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice. He has nearly 30 years of experience that spans roles in private practice, as a general counsel, and with federal antitrust enforcement agencies. He focuses his practice on providing strategic transactional advice and representing clients in government investigations and merger reviews. Joe primarily works with clients in the health care industry.
His work includes representing health care companies before the FTC and DOJ in merger reviews, counseling them on the antitrust aspects of transactions, and advising on risks associated with payer-provider contracting. He also advises pharmaceutical distributors, hospitals, health plans, and physician groups on a broad range of compliance issues, including information sharing, contractual arrangements, and interactions with competitors.
Prior to joining Mintz, Joe was a partner at a Washington, DC-based international law firm, where he was on the steering committee of the firm’s Antitrust Group as well as a member of the firm’s Health Care Group.
Before returning to private practice, Joe was the general counsel of a national trade association for the health insurance industry. Along with supervising a team of attorneys, he served as the association’s policy lead on health care competition issues, regularly testifying before Congress, advocating for positions at FTC policy roundtables, and participating in health care symposia.
Earlier in his career, Joe served as Assistant Chief of the Health Care and Consumer Products Section of the US Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, a lead attorney on DOJ antitrust investigations in multiple industries, and a trial attorney in the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Competition.
Joe is a sought-after speaker at trade association events, including the American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), as well as at the American Conference Institute, American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section, government agencies, and private organizations. He is also frequently quoted in national legal and business publications, including Bloomberg periodicals, Corporate Counsel, Global Competition Review, and Law360.
Representative Matters
- Represented a Georgia-based health care system in securing FTC clearance of its merger with a major competitor, including advising on compliance with the FTC’s second request.
- Represented a major health insurance company in proceedings before the DOJ Antitrust Division and in federal district court related to its attempted merger with another insurer.
- Advised the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans on the merger proposal of two Massachusetts-based hospital systems.
- Represented a media corporation before the DOJ Antitrust Division in connection with the bankruptcy sale of one of its California-based newspapers.
- Represented several health plans as third parties in FTC pharmacy merger investigations.
Education
- George Mason University (JD)
- Emory University (BA)
Recent Insights
Viewpoints
FTC’s Hospital Merger Challenges Hit Speedbump in Philadelphia
December 15, 2020 |Alert
News & Press
Mintz Member and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Division Michael Renaud, Member and Co-chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph Miller, and Member Daniel Weinger co-authored a Law360 expert analysis article that examined an updated business review letter issued by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)'s Antitrust Division to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., which clarified the DOJ's views on licensing and enforcement practices related to standard essential patent (SEP)s.
Events
This webinar, hosted by the American Health Lawyers Association, will provide background on prior antitrust agency vertical merger enforcement, an in-depth discussion of the new Vertical Merger Guidelines, and analysis on how these new Guidelines may impact vertical integration in the health care industry going forward.
Viewpoints
FTC’s Hospital Merger Challenges Hit Speedbump in Philadelphia
December 15, 2020 | Alert | By Bruce Sokler, Joseph Miller, Robert Kidwell, Shawn Skolky
This alert examines a Philadelphia US district court decision that denied the FTC’s and Pennsylvania Attorney General’s request to preliminarily enjoin a proposed merger between Thomas Jefferson University and the Albert Einstein Healthcare Network.
Read more
The Other Shoe Drops: Ringleader of Oncology Treatment Market Allocation Scheme Indicted in Florida District Court
September 24, 2020 | Blog | By Bruce Sokler, Joseph Miller, Shawn Skolky
Another One Bites the Dust – N.D. Tex. Dismisses Antitrust Claims re FRAND Commitments with Prejudice
September 17, 2020 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, Joseph Miller, Adrian Kwan
In the latest decision addressing antitrust liability for FRAND commitments, Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas dismissed a complaint from Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. (“Continental”) alleging, inter alia, violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, and declaratory judgment as to FRAND obligations against Avanci, LLC (“Avanci”) and various members of its patent pool (collectively, “Defendants”).
Read more
DOJ to IEEE: Yes, Injunctive Relief Should Be Available for SEPs, and Stop Saying Otherwise
September 14, 2020 | Blog | By Michael Renaud, James Wodarski, Joseph Miller, Daniel Weinger, Kara E. Grogan
Last Thursday, September 10, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) issued an updated Business Review Letter (“2020 Letter”) to the Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers, Incorporated (“IEEE”) clarifying the DOJ’s views on licensing and enforcement practices related to standard essential patents (“SEPs”).
Read more
Ninth Circuit Reverses FTC Win in FTC v. Qualcomm, Finding No Antitrust Violations from Qualcomm’s Licensing of its Standard-Essential Patents
August 13, 2020 | Blog | By Rich Gervase, Joseph Miller, Michael Renaud, Tinny Song
In a reversal that came as no surprise to many observers, on Tuesday, August 11, 2020, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in FTC v. Qualcomm and vacated the district court’s worldwide, permanent injunction prohibiting several of Qualcomm Incorporated’s (“Qualcomm”) licensing practices with respect to standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) covering cellular technology.
Read more
Justice Department Files Suit to Enjoin Acquisition of Minority Share of Community Hospital; Shows Pitfalls of A Merger “Plan B” and Provides Roadmap of What Not to Say During Deal Negotiations
August 7, 2020 | Blog | By Joseph Miller, Bruce Sokler, Shawn Skolky
DOJ and the FTC Publish Vertical Merger Guidelines
July 13, 2020 | Blog | By Joseph Miller, Bruce Sokler, Robert Kidwell, Evan Moore
Commissioner Chopra Releases Statement on Private Equity Physician Practice Roll-Ups with FTC/DOJ HSR Annual Report
July 10, 2020 | Blog | By Joseph Miller, Robert Kidwell, Shawn Skolky
On Wednesday, an FTC Commissioner used the occasion of a routine report to Congress to send a warning shot to private equity firms, especially those rolling up health care providers. Commissioner Rohit Chopra, an advisor to Senator Elizabeth Warren before he joined the Commission in May 2018, released this statement focusing particular scrutiny on private equity (PE) firms and the practice of acquiring physician groups, especially emergency medicine, anesthesiology, and other services that generate “surprise” out of network charges for otherwise insured patients.
Read more
AbbVie’s Enforcement of its ‘Patent Thicket’ For Humira Under the BPCIA Does Not Provide Cognizable Basis for an Antitrust Violation
June 18, 2020 | Blog | By Rich Gervase, Joseph Miller, Harold Laidlaw, Tinny Song
In a recent decision in In Re Humira (Adalimumab) Antitrust Litigation), No. 19-cv-1873, Judge Shah of the Northern District of Illinois dismissed a consolidated class action complaint filed by U.S. purchasers of AbbVie Inc.’s blockbuster biologic drug Humira alleging that AbbVie had prevented manufacturers of competing biosimilar drugs (“biosimilars”) from entering the U.S. market in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.
Read more
FTC Comments on New Medicare Rule in Support of Expanded Telehealth Services
June 4, 2020 | Blog | By Evan Moore, Joseph Miller
On May 29th, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) submitted a comment to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in support of reducing reimbursement requirements for telehealth services. CMS accepted public comments for its new Interim Final Rule published on April 6, 2020, 85 FR 19230, which changes the Medicare payment regulations to allow for more flexible Medicare service options in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to supporting CMS’s new Interim Final Rule, FTC’s comment recommends permanent measures and further steps to take. The comment offers a valuable insight into the Commission’s stance on telemedicine in relation to health care competition.
Read more
News & Press
Mintz Welcomes 21 Lateral Members in 2020
December 29, 2020
Five Mintz Attorneys Named 2020 BTI Client Service All-Stars
December 11, 2020
DOJ Support Of SEP Injunctions Should Stabilize Licensing
September 24, 2020
Mintz Member and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Division Michael Renaud, Member and Co-chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph Miller, and Member Daniel Weinger co-authored a Law360 expert analysis article that examined an updated business review letter issued by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)'s Antitrust Division to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., which clarified the DOJ's views on licensing and enforcement practices related to standard essential patent (SEP)s.
Firm plays a key role in the largest health care acquisition to date in 2020.
Leading Antitrust Attorney Joseph Miller Joins Mintz
February 03, 2020
Mintz Gains New Antitrust Co-Chair From Crowell & Moring
February 3, 2020
An article published by The National Law Journal highlighted the arrival of Joseph Miller as Co-chair of Mintz’s Antitrust Practice and a Member in the firm’s Health Law Practice, based in Washington, D.C. Mr. Miller is a seasoned antitrust attorney with nearly 30 years of experience that spans roles in private practice, as a general counsel, and with federal antitrust enforcement agencies. He focuses his practice on providing strategic transactional advice and representing clients in the health care and pharmaceutical industries in government investigations and merger reviews.
Mintz Member and Co-Chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph M. Miller co-authored an article published by The Lexis Practice Advisor Journal’s 2019 Healthcare Practice Special Edition that explained how antitrust enforcers, primarily the Federal Trade Commission, analyze healthcare provider mergers, including hospital, outpatient, and physician-group mergers.
Mintz Member and Co-Chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph M. Miller co-authored an article published by The Lexis Practice Advisor Journal explaining how antitrust enforcers, primarily the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, analyze health-insurer mergers.
Mintz Member and Co-Chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph M. Miller co-authored an article published by Competition Policy International on Anthem Inc.’s proposed merger with Cigna Corp. and its implications regarding how the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice approaches bringing monopsony allegations in the health plan merger context.
The Efficiencies Defense: What Would High Court Do?
May 22, 2017
Mintz Member and Co-Chair of the firm’s Antitrust Practice Joseph M. Miller co-authored a Law360 expert analysis article on Anthem Inc.’s proposed merger with Cigna Corp. and the appropriate treatment of efficiencies in a merger challenge.
Events
Speaker
Aug
27
2020
Going Vertical: FTC/DOJ Final Vertical Merger Guidelines
American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA)
Online Event
Speaker
Feb
10
2020
Physicians and Hospitals Law Institute - Price Transparency Rule Compliance, Informing the Patient, and Protecting the Hospital’s Commercial Interests: Mutually Exclusive Concepts?
American Health Lawyers Association
Sheraton Grand, Phoenix, AZ
Panelist
Jun
24
2019
AHLA Annual Meeting: Will Your Deal Be Caught in the Maw of Antitrust Review?
American Health Lawyers Association
Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA
Speaker
Nov
16
2018
Monopsony and the Labor Exemption
Antitrust LLM Program, Antonin Scalia Law School
George Mason University
Panelist
Sep
21
2018
FTC Hearing #2: Monopsony and the State of U.S. Antitrust Law
Monopsony Power and Bargaining Leverage
Constitution Center, Washington, D.C.
Panelist
Jun
25
2018
AHLA Annual Meeting: Narrow and Tiered Provider Networks from a Legal and Data Analytics Perspective
American Health Lawyers Association
Hyatt Regency Chicago Hotel, Chicago, IL
Panelist
Jun
11
2018
2018 Hal White Antitrust Conference: The Use of Bargaining Models in Merger Analysis
Bates White Economics Consulting
St. Regis Washington, Washington, D.C.
Panelist
May
18
2018
Managed Care Disputes and Litigation Conference - Antitrust in the Healthcare Industry: Analyzing the Latest Trends and What the Future Holds
American Conference Institute
The Bellevue Hotel, Philadelphia, PA
Speaker
May
2
2018
Blue Cross Blue Shield 2018 National Summit
Antitrust and the Payer-Provider Relationship: Recent Cases and Implications for Health Plans
Orlando World Center Marriott, Orlando, FL
Panelist
Nov
10
2016
Speaker
Apr
8
2016
64th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting - Health Care Expansion: Good for Consumers?
American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law
Washington, D.C.
Speaker
Oct
30
2015
Part I: Antitrust Analysis, American Health Lawyers Association Webinar
Managed Care Mega Mergers
Panelist
Jun
29
2015
AHLA Annual Meeting, In-House Counsel Program - Dominant Providers and Dominant Plans: The Antitrust Issues
American Health Lawyers Association
Washington, D.C.
Panelist
May
14
2015